Wednesday, March 31, 2010

rt.com: Pakistan Interior Minister:US "sometimes" says osama bin laden is in balochistan

Edited 31 March, 2010, 07:57

Pakistan’s Minister of State for Interior Tasneem Ahmed Qureshi has told RT’s sister channel “Rusiya al-Yaum” that Pakistan is paying an unprecedented high price for becoming hostage to terrorism.

http://rt.com/Politics/2010-03-30/pakistan-interior-minister-interview.html


RT: Some say there is co-operation between American and Pakistani special services aimed at uncovering Taliban and Al-Qaeda members in Pakistan. Could you tell us about the scale of this co-operation, considering that Pakistan’s authorities deny that there is any direct co-operation between their military and US forces?

TAQ: In our relations with the United States we are interested in co-operation between our security services, so as to put an end to terrorism and extremism. Sometimes, the Americans say that Osama bin Laden is hiding in Belugistan in Pakistan. But when we ask them for evidence or reconnaissance data, they refuse to present this to us. However, as soon as we get information about the presence of hostile elements, we immediately undertake necessary actions. But we do not get any information about terrorist chieftains and their probable whereabouts in our territory. If the Americans have any doubts, they should try to meet us to discuss everything. After that we could take the necessary steps.

dailymail: Netanyahu denies reports a close aide slammed Obama as a 'disaster' in wake of meeting

Netanyahu denies reports a close aide slammed Obama as a 'disaster' in wake of meeting


Benjamin Netanyahu was forced yesterday to deny reports that a close aide had described President Barack Obama as Israel's 'greatest disaster'.

The frantic damage-limitation exercise comes after more than two weeks of tension over Israeli construction plans in Jerusalem.

Washington has demanded that Israel freeze all settlement building in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, which the Palestinians see as the capital of their future state.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1261409/Netanyahu-denies-reports-close-aide-slammed-Obama-disaster-wake-meeting.html#ixzz0jeD67TKb

Netanyahu says he will continue to expand the new Israeli areas of East Jerusalem, already home to more than 180,000 people.

President Obama is backing the Palestinian demand that indirect talks designed to kick-start the moribund peace process cannot begin unless Israel agrees to a complete freeze.

The issue has sparked a major crisis in U.S.-Israeli relations that wrecked the first visit to the region by U.S. vice president Joe Biden earlier this month.

Last week, Netanyahu met Obama in the Oval Office, but in circumstances that Israeli commentators said recalled a visit by an unwanted 'dictator' rather than a close friend and ally.

There was no press conference, no photographed handshake and Netanyahu was forced to use an anonymous side entrance.

Half-way through the meeting, the president left Netanyahu to go and dine with his family and did not invite the prime minister to join him.

Yedioth Ahronoth, Israel’s largest newspaper, said a trusted confidant of Netanyahu called Obama Israel’s 'greatest disaster' alongside a scathing description of his 'humiliating' treatment at the White House.

'President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton adapted a clear Palestinian point of view,' said the anonymous aide. 'This is a sick and insane matter; it is a catastrophic situation. We are facing a hostile administration like never before.'

'The prime minister emphatically rejects the anonymous quotes about President Obama that a newspaper attributed to one of his confidants, and he condemns them,' Netanyahu said in a statement issued by his office on Sunday.

Snub: Obama is said to have excused himself from the meeting with  Netanyahu to dine with his family, but did not invite the Israeli PM to  join him

Snub: Obama is said to have excused himself from the meeting with Netanyahu to dine with his family, but did not invite the Israeli PM to join him

Speaking to the weekly cabinet session in Jerusalem yesterday, he described relations between Israel and the U.S. as 'those of allies and friends'.

'I would like to make it clear: I find these remarks to be unacceptable. They are from nobody acting on my behalf,' he said.

David Axelrod, a key adviser to President Obama, also said on Sunday that the frosty White House reception was not a calculated insult.

'This was a working meeting among friends. And so there was no snub intended,' Axelrod told CNN. He said the two leaders were focused on practicalities, not protocol.

'This was not about formalities. This was not about a ceremonial meeting. This was a working meeting. We have a deep, abiding interest in Israel's security. And we believe the peace process is essential to that,' he said.

But many Israelis, who in polls give Obama an approval rating of less than 10 per cent, are not convinced.

'This government has made large concessions to launch negotiations, including the possible recognition of a Palestinian state and freezing construction. All these have been disregarded, and instead the bar kept being raised,' said National Infrastructure Minister Uzi Landau.

Washington Post: CIA and Yemen playing a doubles game

CIA and Yemen playing a doubles game

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/03/yemeni_intelligence_playing_a.html

If Yemen seems like a terrorist playground today, the answer might be that its top intelligence service is run by jihadis.

According to a report in the reliable Paris-based Intelligence Online newsletter, White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan, “who has traveled twice to Yemen in the last six months, has been told by his advisers that Yemen's Political Security Organization has been infiltrated at the highest levels by jihadists active in the country."

A Brennan spokesman declined to comment on the report, which most likely originated in the region. But it came as no surprise to a top former CIA counterterrorism official, who said with a chuckle: “that report is stating the obvious.”

“In 2006,” the IO newsletter continues, “Political Security let Nasser al-Wahayshi, the former secretary of Osama bin Laden, and a dozen of his associates escape from prison in Sanaa. The escapees are believed to have established jihadists camps in the province of Chabwa, to the east of Sanaa. Political Security is run by Ghaled al-Qimch, President Ali Abdallah Saleh’s trusted right hand man.”

All this may be obvious, indeed, but it raises all sorts of troubling questions about Yemen, a virtual arms and manpower supply depot for al-Qaeda’s assault on Saudi Arabia and the rest of the region.

“Last October,” my Post colleague David Ignatius reported Friday, “the Yemeni government came to the CIA with a request: Could the agency collect intelligence that might help target the network of a U.S.-born al-Qaeda recruiter named Anwar al-Aulaqi?”

Aulaqi, Ignatius reminds us, is linked to the Fort Hood shootings and the recruitment of Nigerian underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab:

“On Nov. 5, U.S. Army Maj. Nidal Hasan killed 13 of his fellow soldiers at Fort Hood, Tex.; Hasan had exchanged 18 or more e-mails with Aulaqi in the months before the shootings, according to the Associated Press. Then, on Christmas Day, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a Nigerian who had been living in Yemen, tried to blow up an airliner bound for Detroit; he is said to have confessed later that Aulaqi was one of his trainers for this mission,” Ignatius wrote.

The Yemenis wanted CIA help to get Aulaqi, Ignatius writes. His sources told him:

“The primary reason was that the agency lacked specific evidence that he threatened the lives of Americans -- which is the threshold for any capture-or-kill operation against a U.S. citizen. The Yemenis also wanted U.S. Special Forces' help on the ground in pursuing Aulaqi; that, too, was refused.”

But given the jihadist inclinations of some elements of the PSO, it's also an intriguing possibilty that the CIA suspected the Yemenis were playing a double game -- angling for clues about sensitive sources and sophisticated electronic methods the agency is using to pusue al-Qaeda in the region.

A Yemeni official acknowledged to me Friday that the PSO has had security problems, noting that 11 “junior officers” were prosecuted for their role in the 2006 jail break.

“It’s a poor country,” where even intelligence officers are susceptible to bribes, said the official on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press.

The problems began back in the late 1980s-early 1990s, he said, when the PSO recruited Yemeni veterans of the Afghan war against the Soviets.

"It was a double-edged sword," he said. Some remained jihadis, others would eventually help the PSO penetrate terrorist cells.

“We’re addressing this,” he added. “We’ve demoted and shuffled people around” and taken other measures to tighten security.

Indeed, in recent months Yemen and U.S. security services have dramatically ramped up their counterterrorism cooperation while, behind the scenes, they each play a double game.

If the Yemen scenario sounds familiar, it’s because U.S. intelligence grapples with similar challenges today in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere. Indeed, throughout the Vietnam War, the CIA and military intelligence services had to work with South Vietnamese security services they knew had been thoroughly penetrated by the communists.

That’s why the CIA runs on two tracks in Yemen and virtually everywhere else around the world, including most allied countries.

On one track it works with the host country’s intelligence and military services.

On the other, it goes alone.

Guardian: Israel lobby presses Congress to soften Obama's tough stance on Netanyahu

Israel lobby presses Congress to soften Obama's tough stance on Netanyahu

American Israel Public Affairs Committee circulates letter urging White House to 'reinforce' relationship with Israel

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/30/us-israel-lobby-pressure-obama

America's main pro-Israel lobby group is mobilising members of Congress to pressure the White House over its bitter public confrontation with Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister.

The move, by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac), appears aimed at exploiting differences in the Obama administration as it decides how to use the crisis around settlement building in Jerusalem to press Israel towards concessions to kickstart peace negotiations.

Aipac has persuaded more than three-quarters of the members of the US House of Representatives to sign a letter calling for an end to public criticism of Israel and urging the US to "reinforce" its relationship with the Jewish state.

The open letter, which has been circulating among members of Congress for the last week, says that while it is recognised that there will be differences between the two countries, they should be kept behind closed doors. "Our view is that such differences are best resolved quietly, in trust and confidence," it says.

The public differences, and revelations of Obama's private snubs of Netanyahu at the White House last week, have proved embarrassing to the Israeli leader at home, where he has been accused of undermining Israel's most important relationship.

Signatories to Aipac's letter include Steny Hoyer, the Democrat majority leader, and Eric Cantor, the Republican whip. The wording is similar to an email Aipac sent out during Netanyahu's visit, describing Obama's criticisms of the Israeli government as "a matter of serious concern" and calling on the US administration "to take immediate steps to defuse the tension with the Jewish state".

But while Aipac has for years influenced US policy on Israel, by targeting members of Congress who criticise the Jewish state, it may no longer have the same impact.

Robert Malley, a former special assistant to President Bill Clinton for Arab-Israeli affairs, said the administration's decision to take a once routine disagreement over settlement construction in East Jerusalem and turn it in to a confrontation is a reflection of the determination in the White House.

"This episode tells us more about the past and the future than the present. It's a reflection of the accumulated frustration and mistrust of the Netanyahu government by the White House. For the future, they're headed for a collision on the pace and nature of peace negotiations," he said. "We're seeing determination."

A source, who is consulted by administration officials on Israel policy but did not wish to be named, said that having chosen to take Netanyahu on, Obama cannot afford to back away. "The administration's credibility is at stake – in Israel and the Arab world. Netanyahu thought he had the better of it last year after he humiliated the president by rejecting his demand for a settlement freeze. If the administration does not follow through on this, or reaches some compromise that takes the heat off the Israelis, I suspect it will be almost impossible for us to get anything off the ground," he said.

Netanyahu appears to have been caught off guard by Obama's stand, perhaps because he was overconfident of being able to bypass the administration by relying on strong support for Israel in Congress. But while Aipac has been able to mobilise support for its letter, Congressional leaders have remained largely silent on the substance of the dispute.

That is, in part, because there is little enthusiasm for Jewish settlements. In addition, the White House has played an unusual card in suggesting that Netanyahu's intransigence is endangering US interests in the Middle East, and the lives of US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"So far, I've been surprised by how muted congressional reaction has been," said Malley. "It may come, but if the administration manages to portray this as an issue of US national interest, it may be able to sustain a level of criticism."

However, there are reports of divisions within the administration on how to proceed. The US special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, and the national security adviser, James Jones, believe Israeli governments respond to pressure. Last year an Israeli diplomatic memorandum described Jones as having told European officials that the US administration would take a hard line with the government in Jerusalem. Some officials favour mapping out a blueprint for peace and pressing both sides to adopt it.

But other officials argue against forcing Netanyahu to make compromises that will bring down his rightwing coalition. There has been criticism from Dennis Ross, who served as Bill Clinton's Middle East envoy. Now a Middle East strategist for the Obama administration, he is reported to be arguing for the White House to ease up on Netanyahu. However, Ross is regarded by some sceptics as too close to Israel. He has publicly argued that Jerusalem must remain undivided and is regarded with suspicion by the Palestinians, who saw him as effectively negotiating on Israel's behalf, rather than as a neutral mediator.

Malley says that whatever the Obama administration does it is almost certain to lead to further confrontation with the Israeli government. "The next crisis is more or less inevitable, given the diverging views of the Israeli and US governments on the pace and direction of the emerging talks," he said.

abcnews: EXCLUSIVE: Iran Nuclear Scientist Defects to U.S. In CIA 'Intelligence Coup'

EXCLUSIVE: Iran Nuclear Scientist Defects to U.S. In CIA 'Intelligence Coup'

Shahram Amiri Disappeared Last June in Saudi Arabia, Reportedly Now Resettled in the United States

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/iran-nuclear-scientist-defects-us-cia-intelligence-coup/story?id=10231729

An award-winning Iranian nuclear scientist, who disappeared last year under mysterious circumstances, has defected to the CIA and been resettled in the United States, according to people briefed on the operation by intelligence officials.

The officials were said to have termed the defection of the scientist, Shahram Amiri, "an intelligence coup" in the continuing CIA operation to spy on and undermine Iran's nuclear program.

A spokesperson for the CIA declined to comment. In its declassified annual report to Congress, the CIA said, "Iran is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons though we do not know whether Tehran eventually will decide to produce nuclear weapons."

Amiri, a nuclear physicist in his early 30s, went missing last June three days after arriving in Saudi Arabia on a pilgrimage, according to the Iranian government. He worked at Tehran's Malek Ashtar University, which is closely connected to Iran's Revolutionary Guard, according to the Associated Press.

"The significance of the coup will depend on how much the scientist knew in the compartmentalized Iranian nuclear program," said former White House counter-terrorism official Richard Clarke, an ABC News consultant. "Just taking one scientist out of the program will not really disrupt it."

Iran's Foreign Minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, and other Iranian officials last year blamed the U.S. for "kidnapping" Amiri, but his whereabouts had remained a mystery until now.

According to the people briefed on the intelligence operation, Amiri's disappearance was part of a long-planned CIA operation to get him to defect. The CIA reportedly approached the scientist in Iran through an intermediary who made an offer of resettlement on behalf of the United States.

Since the late 1990s, the CIA has attempted to recruit Iranian scientists and officials through contacts made with relatives living in the United States, according to former U.S. intelligence officials. Case officers have been assigned to conduct hundreds of interviews with Iranian-Americans in the Los Angeles area in particular, the former officials said.

Amiri has been extensively debriefed since his defection by the CIA, according to the people briefed on the situation. They say Amiri helped to confirm U.S. intelligence assessments about the Iranian nuclear program.

In September, President Barack Obama announced the U.S., the United Kingdom and France had evidence that Iran "has been building a covert uranium enrichment facility near Qom for several years."

One Iranian web site reported that Amiri had worked at the Qom facility prior to his defection.

The New York Times reported Saturday that international inspectors and Western intelligence agencies suspect "Tehran is preparing to build more sites in defiance of United Nations demands."

Officials at Iran's mission to the United Nations did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

"The Americans are definitely letting the Iranians know that they are active in going after Iran's nuclear program," said Hooman Majd, an Iranian-American journalist.

A colleague of Amiri's at Tehran University called the disappearance "a disturbing sign" and blamed the Saudis for helping the U.S., according government-approved English-language web site Press TV.

"The Saudi regime has effectively discredited itself and will be seen by those who know what has gone on in the region as being confined to American demands and effectively abiding by American wishes," said Mohammad Marandi, a Tehran University professor, according to the Iranian web site.

Yahoo News: White House 'puzzled' over Netanyahu storm(Israel)

White House 'puzzled' over Netanyahu storm

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100330/pl_afp/usmideastpoliticsobama

The White House expressed puzzlement Tuesday at widely-held perceptions that President Barack Obama delivered a calculated snub to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week.

As a row over Israeli settlement building raged, Netanyahu held late-night talks at the White House a week ago, but did not get a press appearance with Obama and the administration failed to even release an official photo.

He returned home to a torrent of criticism in the Israeli media over his treatment, with some commentators arguing he had been humiliated in a test of wills with Obama over sharp differences on Middle East peace diplomacy.

"I'm puzzled by the notion that somehow it's a bad deal to get two hours with the president almost entirely alone," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said.

"That doesn't seem like a lot of punishment to me."

On Sunday, another senior White House official, David Axelrod, had insisted that no snub was intended to Netanyahu, but added that friends such as Israel and the United States sometimes needed to talk "bluntly" to one another.

Obama met Netanyahu for two separate meetings at the White House last week lasting two hours.

The next day, the Israeli leader met US envoy George Mitchell and national security staff from the two allies spent hours in negotiations.

But Netanyahu left Washington with no announcement on an agreement to end a rare row with the United States and move towards US-mediated "proximity" talks with the Palestinians.

The row erupted three weeks ago when officials in Israel announced plans to build 1,600 Jewish settlements in annexed east Jerusalem, embarrassing Vice President Joe Biden when he was in the country.

It has since revealed philosophical and political differences between

Washington and Israel towards peace moves, reflected in a row over settlement building that the United States says is undermining its role as a mediator.

A week after Netanyahu's visit to Washington positions only appear to be hardening.

The Israeli leader on Sunday accused the Palestinians of blocking US peace efforts.

The Palestinians had earlier reiterated their refusal to hold even indirect talks without a complete Jewish settlement freeze and following a flare-up of violence in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

New York Times: Pakistan Arrests a Top Crime Official

Pakistan Arrests a Top Crime Official

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/31/world/asia/31pstan.html?ref=world

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — The Supreme Court ordered the arrest of a senior white-collar crime official on Tuesday, and threatened to send the nation’s top anticorruption official to jail if he did not swiftly seek the reopening of corruption cases in Switzerland against President Asif Ali Zardari.

The dramatic arrest in the magisterial courtroom renewed the confrontation between the Chief Justice, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, and the civilian government. The battle has simmered since last December when the court effectively restored corruption cases, many stemming from the 1990s, against thousands of politicians, including Mr. Zardari, and asked the government to inform the Swiss judiciary that Pakistan wanted to continue to pursue cases against the president.

As president, Mr. Zardari is granted immunity from prosecution under the Constitution. But Mr. Chaudhry appeared to question the inviolability of the president’s immunity during Tuesday’s hearing, saying that Mr. Zardari or his legal representative had yet to claim immunity before the court.

Mr. Zardari served 11 years in jail on charges of corruption that he and his lawyers have always insisted were politically motivated, noting that he was never convicted of anything. His supporters and others have accused Mr. Chaudhry of waging a campaign against the president and using the bench to meddle in politics.

The presidential spokesman, Farhatullah Babar, attended the Supreme Court hearing on Tuesday. Mr. Babar said Tuesday night that he could not comment on judicial matters.

Mr. Zardari also serves as chairman of the Pakistan Peoples Party, and the press secretary for the party, Fouzia Wahab, said the party would file an appeal against the arrest of the white-collar crime official, Ahmad Riaz Sheikh.

Earlier this month, Mr. Sheikh was appointed head of the white-collar crime department of the Federal Investigation Agency, three months after corruption cases against him were reopened by the Supreme Court last December.

His arrest appeared to be intended as a serious signal to Mr. Zardari. Mr. Sheikh had served prison time in the same jail with Mr. Zardari, and was known as a friend of the president and the interior minister, Rehman Malik.

A member of the Pakistan Peoples Party, Asma Arbab Alamgir, said that the Supreme Court was “indulging in political victimization” against the party. “We don’t understand why the chief justice is adopting such extreme behavior,” Ms. Alamgir said. “The government is fully implementing the court orders. The government is totally cooperative.”

The chief justice also took aim at the chairman of the National Accountability Bureau, Naveed Ahsan, saying he was giving Mr. Ahsan until Wednesday to carry out an order to write to the Swiss authorities about pursuing the Zardari corruption cases.

The bureau is the state anticorruption agency dealing with politicians and government servants.

Mr. Ahsan told the chief justice that the government had refrained from contacting Switzerland because the bureau believed Mr. Zardari enjoyed immunity.

“You had 80 days, but you didn’t take any action,” Mr. Chaudhry told Mr. Ahsan. If Mr. Ahsan could not satisfy the court on Wednesday, he, too, would be arrested, Mr. Chaudhry said.

The government withdrew criminal proceedings against Mr. Zardari in Switzerland in 2008.

But the Supreme Court has indicated it regards the cases as extant because the former attorney general, Malik Qayyum, acted in a personal capacity, not as an official, when he told the Swiss that Pakistan no longer wanted to prosecute Mr. Zardari.

Mr. Zardari was a primary beneficiary of an amnesty decree devised in 2007 with the help of the United States and Britain as part of a deal to engineer the comeback of Mr. Zardari’s wife, former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, after years in exile.

A relatively novice politician, Mr. Zardari became president eight months after his wife was assassinated in December 2007.

Last December, the Supreme Court overturned the amnesty decree, which had brought the couple back to Pakistan.

At the same time, the court demanded to know why $60 million in suspect gains of Mr. Zardari had been given back to offshore companies in his name rather than returned to the national treasury.

The public arrest of Mr. Sheikh, who was taken out of the courtroom in handcuffs, and the threat to imprison Mr. Ahsan provided another blow, said Babar Sattar, a constitutional scholar.

“So long as the Supreme Court is making sermons, the government can ignore it,” Mr. Sattar said. “But when it detains people, it will get harder for Zardari and the government to convince bureaucrats to stall on the court’s orders.”

Foxnews:CIA: Iran Moving Closer to Nuclear Weapon

CIA: Iran Moving Closer to Nuclear Weapon

http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/30/cia-report-iran-capable-of-making-nuke/

A recently published report by the Central Intelligence Agency says Iran is still working on building a nuclear weapon despite some technical setbacks and international resistance -- and the Pentagon say it's still concerned about Iran's ambitions. The mandated report to congress reads, "Iran continues to develop a range of capabilities that could be applied to producing nuclear weapons, if a decision is made to do so."

"Iran continued to expand its nuclear infrastructure and continued uranium enrichment and activities related to its heavy water research reactor, despite multiple United Nations Security Council Resolutions since late 2006 calling for the suspensin of those activities," the report says.

The CIA's new characterization of Iran's nuclear program stands in contradiction to the 2007 National Intelligence Estimate on Iran, which determined the country halted its nuclear production efforts in 2003.

The CIA report is unable to determine if Tehran has come to a decision about whether or not to build a bomb.

Pentagon Spokesman Geoff Morrell says the U.S. remains concerned about Iran's ambitions. "They have not done enough to convince any of us that, indeed, their aims are purely peaceful," Morrell told Pentagon reporters Tuesday. "That is why this government, after extending an outstretched hand to Iran now for the better part of a year, has now pivoted. And though we haven't shut the door to engagement, we are clearly pursuing the pressure track."

A February report by the IAEA, the United Nations nuclear watchdog, decries a series of failures by Iranian officials to comply with requests that would guarantee its nuclear projects are not for the purpose of building a weapon. "Iran has not suspended its enrichment related activities or its work on heavy water related," the report reads. "Contrary to the request of the Board of Governors and the requirements of the Security Council, Iran has neither implemented the Additional Protocol nor cooperated with the Agency in connection with the remaining issues of concern, which need to be clarified to exclude the possibility of military dimensions to Iran's nuclear programme."

Perhaps just as disturbing as Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions are their chemical and biological warfare capabilities. "We judge that Iran is capable of weaponizing chemical warfare agents in a variety of delivery systems," the CIA report says. In addition, "Iran probably has the capability to produce some biological warfare agents for offensive purposes, if it made the decision to do so."

Iran is still far from having the ability to fire intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), but it does have a stockpile of shorter and medium range misses that if outfitted with a warhead could pose a grave threat to countries in the region, including Israel. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said repeatedly he would like to see Israel wiped from the map.

But according to the CIA report Iran has stated its intentions to put a satellite into orbit and it has dedicated $250 million towards that goal. Rocket technology needed to put a satellite into orbit is very similar to the technology needed for an ICBM. The CIA concludes that Iran has attempted to put a number of satellites into space, but it can't confirm if any of those efforts were successful, despite February 2009 press reports claiming Iran managed to launch the Omid satellite.

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

guardian.co.uk:Israel lobby presses Congress to soften Obama's tough stance on Netanyahu

Israel lobby presses Congress to soften Obama's tough stance on Netanyahu

American Israel Public Affairs Committee circulates letter urging White House to 'reinforce' relationship with Israel

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/30/us-israel-lobby-pressure-obama

America's main pro-Israel lobby group is mobilising members of Congress to pressure the White House over its bitter public confrontation with Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister.

The move, by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac), appears aimed at exploiting differences in the Obama administration as it decides how to use the crisis around settlement building in Jerusalem to press Israel toward concessions to kickstart peace negotiations.

Aipac has persuaded more than three-quarters of the members of the US House of Representatives to sign a letter calling for an end to public criticism of Israel and urging the US to "reinforce" its relationship with the Jewish state.

The open letter, which has been circulating among members of Congress for the last week, says that while it is recognised that there will be differences between the two countries, they should be kept behind closed doors. "Our view is that such differences are best resolved quietly, in trust and confidence," it says.

The public differences, and revelations of Obama's private snubs of Netanyahu at the White House last week, have proved embarrassing to the Israeli leader at home, where he has been accused of undermining Israel's most important relationship.

Signatories to Aipac's letter include Steny Hoyer, the Democrat majority leader, and Eric Cantor, the Republican whip. The wording is similar to an email Aipac sent out during Netanyahu's visit, describing Obama's criticisms of the Israeli government as "a matter of serious concern" and calling on the US administration "to take immediate steps to defuse the tension with the Jewish state".

But while Aipac has for years influenced US policy on Israel, by targeting members of Congress who criticise the Jewish state, it may no longer have the same impact.

Robert Malley, a former special assistant to President Bill Clinton for Arab-Israeli affairs, said the administration's decision to take a once routine disagreement over settlement construction in East Jerusalem and turn it in to a confrontation is a reflection of the determination in the White House.

"This episode tells us more about the past and the future than the present. It's a reflection of the accumulated frustration and mistrust of the Netanyahu government by the White House. For the future, they're headed for a collision on the pace and nature of peace negotiations," he said. "We're seeing determination."

A source, who is consulted by administration officials on Israel policy but did not wish to be named, said that having chosen to take Netanyahu on, Obama cannot afford to back away. "The administration's credibility is at stake – in Israel and the Arab world. Netanyahu thought he had the better of it last year after he humiliated the president by rejecting his demand for a settlement freeze. If the administration does not follow through on this, or reaches some compromise that takes the heat off the Israelis, I suspect it will be almost impossible for us to get anything off the ground," he said.

Netanyahu appears to have been caught off guard by Obama's stand, perhaps because he was overconfident of being able to bypass the administration by relying on strong support for Israel in Congress. But while Aipac has been able to mobilise support for its letter, Congressional leaders have remained largely silent on the substance of the dispute.

That is, in part, because there is little enthusiasm for Jewish settlements. In addition, the White House has played an unusual card in suggesting that Netanyahu's intransigence is endangering US interests in the Middle East, and the lives of US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"So far, I've been surprised by how muted congressional reaction has been," said Malley. "It may come, but if the administration manages to portray this as an issue of US national interest, it may be able to sustain a level of criticism."

However, there are reports of divisions within the administration on how to proceed. The US special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, and the national security adviser, James Jones, believe Israeli governments respond to pressure. Last year, an Israeli diplomatic memorandum described Jones as having told European officials that the US administration would take a hard line with the government in Jerusalem. Some officials favour mapping out a blueprint for peace and pressing both sides to adopt it.

But other officials argue against forcing Netanyahu to make compromises that will bring down his rightwing coalition. There has been criticism from Dennis Ross, who served as Bill Clinton's Middle East envoy. Now a Middle East strategist for the Obama administration, he is reported to be arguing for the White House to ease up on Netanyahu. However, Ross is regarded by some sceptics as too close to Israel. He has publicly argued that Jerusalem must remain undivided and is regarded with suspicion by the Palestinians, who saw him as effectively negotiating on Israel's behalf, rather than as a neutral mediator.

Malley says that whatever the Obama administration does it is almost certain to lead to further confrontation with the Israeli government. "The next crisis is more or less inevitable, given the diverging views of the Israeli and US governments on the pace and direction of the emerging talks," he said.

Monday, March 29, 2010

Times Online: Nato commanders to put Afghan troops in front line for new southern push(Kandahar)

March 29, 2010

Nato commanders to put Afghan troops in front line for new southern push

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/afghanistan/article7079612.ece

Nato commanders are to change their tactics in the battle for Kandahar, putting Afghan forces at the forefront of the operation to drive the Taleban from their spiritual heartland.

Operation Omid — the Pashto word for hope — is the next stage of a year-long campaign to retake southern Afghanistan. It will target the southern city and surrounding areas with a “gradual squeeze” different from Operation Moshtarak, the airborne assault on the Marjah district of Helmand province last month.

A key aspect will be putting large numbers of new Afghan troops into chains of “firebases” — offering artillery support to infantry — to be built on the approaches to the city, according to Western and Afghan officials. A political drive will parallel the military operation to try to heal tribal fissures that the Taleban have exploited.

The Kandahar mission will be followed by operations to stabilise the provinces of Zabul and Ghazni. Khalid Pashtun, an MP for Kandahar, said that 24 firebases will be built in the district of Zarai. They will be used to control the movement of insurgents and weapons as part of Nato commander General Stanley McChrystal’s plan to secure the population from Taleban influence.

Kandahar holds symbolic value: it was the first capital of Afghanistan, and became the birthplace of the Taleban in 1994. The performance of Afghan forces will be critical if militants are to be convinced that they cannot succeed even after a planned reduction in Western forces in the next three to five years. In this respect, the operation will bear comparison with the Charge of the Knights operation in Basra in 2008, in which the Iraqi Army emerged as a credible force.

However, there remain concerns over the capacity of Afghan security forces, particularly the police. Mr Pashtun told The Times: “The Americans said that the operation will be under the control of the ANA \[Afghan Army\]. This is just politics. They want to boost the ANA morale.”

General Zahir Azimi, a spokesman for the Defence Ministry, said: “Our troops know well how to fight. They have trained very well but because we don’t have very good equipment . . . we can’t launch operations on our own.”

Leaked recent British assessments of the Afghan police have been pessimistic, suggesting that in addition to widespread incompetence and criminality, about 25 per cent of the theoretical 82,000-man force are “ghost officers” created so that senior officials can claim the salaries of fictional police.

Although more capable than the police, the Afghan Army has low literacy rates and an acute recruitment problem in the south, where it most needs to secure popular support. Three key districts, Zarai, Panjwai and Arghandab, are seen as holding the key to controlling Kandahar.

Since 2006 Nato forces have tried, with limited success, to stabilise the districts. The attempt to rebuild a political consensus will be as critical as the success of the military effort. Western officials admit that Ahmad Wali Karzai, President Karzai’s brother, who is the dominant force in the province, is a divisive figure.

Mark Sedwill, a senior Nato civilian representative, said: “Certain groups are well represented, other tribal groups feel disenfranchised. And of course that tension tends to fuel disagreement.”

Michael Semple, a fellow at the Carr Centre for Human Rights Policy, said: “The grievances relate to the abuse of power by Ahmad Wali Karzai. But \[he\] is still running the show. Compared to Marjah this is the big one and it is going to be highly contested.” Telephone calls to Mr Wali Karzai, who denies claims of his involvement in the drugs trade, were not returned yesterday.

***New York Times: Rift Exposes Split in Views on Mideast (United States-Israel Relations,GENERAL'S take,gates,petraeus)

News Analysis

Rift Exposes Split in Views on Mideast

...

He was leading a team sent to find illegal weapons but discovered something else in the barracks of the Republican Guard: On many walls he saw drawings of Al Aksa Mosque in Jerusalem. Strangling its dome was a serpent with the word “Israel” on it.

General Dayton said he was amazed to see such fervor for the issue so many hundreds of miles away. He realized then, he said, the significance of the Israeli-Arab dispute beyond its borders.]


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/29/world/middleeast/29mideast.html?ref=world

JERUSALEM — When Israel announced new housing units for Jews in East Jerusalem at the start of a visit this month by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu apologized for the timing and expressed regret at the embarrassment. Mr. Biden accepted his explanation, and the two sides seemed prepared to move on.

Since then, though, that event has remained lodged at the center of American-Israeli relations. How it got there, and why it remains, sheds light on the growing divide between the Obama administration and the Netanyahu government. The current discord, ostensibly over Jerusalem housing, is really over the role of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as well as over differing perceptions of the Palestinians’ capacity for self-rule.

While Mr. Biden seemed satisfied with the Israeli explanation, others were clearly not. Among them was Amr Moussa, the secretary general of the Arab League. A week earlier, he reluctantly announced his organization’s approval of indirect peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, had requested the support, feeling unable to renew talks without pan-Arab cover. Arab foreign ministers in Cairo offered a tepid go-ahead despite their skepticism about Israel’s intentions.

After the plans for more Jerusalem housing were announced, however, Mr. Moussa called Mr. Abbas to say the talks should not proceed. Mr. Abbas called Washington to describe his predicament, which produced a phone call from Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to Mr. Netanyahu, demanding steps to keep the indirect talks alive. The sequence of calls was described by an American advocate for Israel and confirmed by a senior Palestinian leader.

On Sunday, in his first public comment on the issue, Mr. Netanyahu told his cabinet officials that any divide with the United States could be managed.

“Even if there are disagreements,” he said, “these are disagreements between friends, and that’s how they will stay.”

But two main issues are keeping American-Israeli tensions on the front burner: disagreement on the effects of what happens in Jerusalem on the rest of the Middle East, and the strength of the Palestinian leadership.

The Obama administration considers establishing a Palestinian state central to other regional goals; it also believes that the Palestinians, led by Mr. Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, are ready to run a country. The Netanyahu government disagrees on both counts. It thinks the issue of Palestinian statehood has little effect on broader American concerns and is also dubious about the ability of the Palestinians to create an entity that can resist a radical takeover.

The centrality of the dispute over Jerusalem is the clearer of the disagreements.

Last fall, Gen. James L. Jones, the national security adviser, told a liberal American Jewish group that solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was central to easing international tensions.

The Netanyahu government and its supporters reject this argument.

“To me, this puts into question the administration’s sense of reality,” said Sallai Meridor, who was Israel’s ambassador to Washington toward the end of the administration of George W. Bush. “To think that what happens here has a major impact on the state of affairs in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq is, in my view, quite far from accurate.”

Other top American security officials agree that solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a strategic American concern and that the dispute is a cause of regional instability affecting Washington’s interests.

Gen. David H. Petraeus, head of United States Central Command, made this point recently in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, adding that a perception of an American tilt toward Israel made it harder for the United States. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates broadly endorsed his point.

Lt. Gen. Keith W. Dayton, who heads an effort to train Palestinian security forces in the West Bank, likes to tell a story about his work in Iraq after Saddam Hussein was deposed in 2003.

He was leading a team sent to find illegal weapons but discovered something else in the barracks of the Republican Guard: On many walls he saw drawings of Al Aksa Mosque in Jerusalem. Strangling its dome was a serpent with the word “Israel” on it.

General Dayton said he was amazed to see such fervor for the issue so many hundreds of miles away. He realized then, he said, the significance of the Israeli-Arab dispute beyond its borders.

Since arriving here, he has championed Palestinian security skills. Where Israeli generals say the forces are doing fine work but could not keep down violence without Israeli actions, General Dayton gives the Palestinians far more credit and wants the Israelis to cut back on their incursions.

This highlights the other significant disagreement between the two governments: the readiness and reliability of the Palestinian leadership of Mr. Abbas and Mr. Fayyad. Obama administration officials say they believe that the Palestinian leadership is the best in history, focused on nonviolence, institution building and prosperity. Israelis are skeptical.

Jonathan Spyer, a senior research fellow at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, argued the Netanyahu perspective in a recent opinion piece in the English version of the newspaper Haaretz. In it, he accused the Obama administration of living with illusions, because with Hamas rule in Gaza it is “past time to acknowledge that a single, united Palestinian national movement no longer exists.”

He added that throughout the Palestinian areas, “the anti-Western and antimodern element is flourishing, and has state backers in Iran and Syria.”

While many Israeli leaders take Mr. Fayyad more seriously than that, they still argue that the timetable the Obama administration posits to begin establishment of a state — two years — is illusory because Hamas remains a threat.

“One needs to see what has taken place here during the past 17 years,” Moshe Yaalon, a top government minister, said in an interview last week in an Israeli newspaper. “The belief of land for peace has failed. We got land in return for terror in Judea and Samaria and land in return for rockets in Gaza. What, the Americans don’t see this?”

Israelis are upset that Washington does not publicly criticize the Palestinian leadership for anti-Israel incitement in its media, and over the recent naming of a public square for a woman who took part in the hijacking of an Israeli bus in 1978 that led to the deaths of dozens.

It remains unclear how the Americans and Israelis will settle their dispute. But the longer the dispute goes on, the more isolated Israel becomes, because much of the world disagrees with it.

As Michael Young wrote in The Daily Star newspaper of Lebanon, “More countries than ever before see Israel as the problem.”

He added that the “hardening perception is that Israel’s irresponsible settlement expansion plan is destroying all prospects for a mutually satisfactory accord with the Palestinians, and that the ensuing instability will harm everyone.”

Jerusalem Post:'Lack of ME peace affects US'(israel,bob gates,defense secretary,concurs with petraeus)



Israeli-Palestinian tensions are affecting US national security interests in the region, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday.

"The lack of progress toward Middle East peace is clearly an issue that's exploited by our adversaries in the region" and "does affect USnational security interests in the region," Gates was cited by AFP as saying.

Gates spoke at a news conference amid US discontent with Israel over its announced plans to build new homes for Jews in east Jerusalem, which Washington says hurts Mideast peace efforts.

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Washington Post(Spy Talk): Osama tape has intelligence officials fuming

Osama tape has intelligence officials fuming

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/03/osama_tape_has_intelligence_of.html

U.S. counterterrorism officials seemed to have a hard time making up their minds on how to respond to Osama bin Laden’s latest tape.

On the one hand, the Qaeda leader’s threat to kill American captives was “so ridiculous” that it hardly merited a response, one official said.

“They started doing that 10, 12, 15 years ago,” he virtually sputtered to CNN’s national security producer Pam Benson -- anonymously, of course.

On the other, another official told Reuters, bin Laden’s threat to retaliate if the 9/11 plot organizer Khalid Sheik Mohammed, now in Guantanamo, were executed, was so absurd it demanded a response.

But while U.S. officials seemed so angry they could hardly talk -- and only anonymously, at that -- other intelligence sources and terrorism experts said on the record that bin Laden’s message was less a real threat that an exercise in personal and political propaganda.

"My message to you," bin Laden says in one of the excerpts aired by al-Jazeera, "is about our prisoners in U.S. custody." An al-Qaeda affiliate in Pakistan has been holding U.S. Army Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl since June 2009.

But it’s not really about taking and killing prisoners, says Peter Bergen, an author of well received books about bin Laden and co-editor of the AfPak Channel, a project of our sister publication, Foreign Policy.

“Main function,” Bergen said of bin Laden's missive: "Proof of life."

“It’s part of his ongoing campaign to confirm his relevance,” agreed Brian Jenkins, the longtime terrorism analyst at the RAND Corporation.

“Any statement from bin Laden,” echoed Paul R. Pillar, the CIA’s National Intelligence Officer for the Near East and South Asia when he retired in 2005, “serves at least the modest purpose, for him and his group, of showing that he is alive and kicking and sufficiently engaged to make new threats that play off recent issues or events.”

“I would tell you that there is no surprise here,” said a former top intelligence official who asked for anonymity because he is still consulting for the government. “This is precisely what I would expect al-Qaeda to do if they captured someone. These are the depraved lunatics who routinely behead captives.”

"I don't think Osama is central to the rallying of violence against the U.S." counters Graham Fuller, another senior former CIA official and author of The Future of Political Islam.

"These messages, which have been getting less messianic and more practical over time, help rally the troops, but I think he could disappear tomorrow and it wouldn't deeply affect the equation," Fuller added.

But dismissing the tape as an audio ego trip would be wrong, even dangerous, others said.

“It’s more than that,” said former CIA counterterrorism analyst Michael Scheuer, who headed Alec Station, the agency’s bin Laden tracking unit, from its inception in 1996 to 1999.

"It’s very timely,” Scheuer said. “It shows he’s near a studio where he can record things and … it shows he’s paying close attention to American politics.”

Yes, Scheuer said, Osama is threatening to respond “tit for tat” to an execution of KSM, whose fate has tied the Obama administration in knots. With that, he puts the White House on the defensive, responsible for al-Qaeda’s execution of Americans.

“He may … see this latest threat as an opportunity to sow some fear among Americans as the issue of how to dispose of the KSM case continues to be discussed, “ Pillar agreed.

But the al-Qaeda kingpin has also launched a strong “strategic” propaganda initiative with the tape, Scheuer and others said.

In the short term, “He’s putting forth an image of Obama in the Muslim world as kind of a Judge Roy Bean” in the Mohammed case, Scheuer said. “You know, ‘We’re gonna try ‘em and hang ‘em.’"

Both the president and Attorney General Eric Holder have expressed confidence that Mohammed would be convicted in a civilian trial and executed.

“Again, it shows they know us better than we know them,” Scheuer added. “The overarching strategic message is, ‘Muslims get the short end of the stick.’

“The only thing U.S. officials look for in these tapes is a threat against us,” he maintained.

The autocratic leaders of Egypt and Saudi Arabia will be forced to go along with bin Laden’s message, at least partly, said Scheuer, a nonpartisan critic of U.S. counterterrorism policies and tactics in his books, congressional testimony and media appearances.

Egyptian President Hosni "Mubarak and the Saudis will say, ‘Bin Laden is yesterday’s news,’ but they’ll also chide Obama and Holder” over pronouncing KSM guilty in advance of a trial, he said.

Intelcenter, an Alexandria, Va., firm that monitors terrorism, took the kidnapping warning seriously, calling it “a valid indicator of an increased threat of kidnappings targeting Americans in the immediate period and following through the Khalid Sheik Mohammed trial in the U.S."

The company predicted “the threat of kidnappings will increase further as the trial begins,” and added that “attempts to kidnap Americans would not be limited to core al-Qaeda.

“The group's regional arms such as al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and al-Qaeda in the Land of the Islamic Maghreb, which has been aggressively targeting Westerners for kidnapping in North Africa, may follow through on bin Laden's threat,” Intelcenter said.

“We have to care about it,” counterterrorism scholar Anthony H. Cordesman said. “It would be dangerous to ignore it.”

“It’s not like he’s running a network and giving orders, but the tapes reach virtually every Muslim extremist group and all the others who have links to them,” Cordesman added. It’s his “strategic communications” strategy.

U.S. intelligence is eavesdropping on extremist communications networks, from cell phones and e-mail traffic to jihadi Web sites, trolling for chatter about the tape and “a rise in key words,” Cordesman said – bombs, kill, attack, assassinate. Human spies can also be tasked to gauge reactions. A rise in attacks on U.S. targets can mean the base has been energized by bin Laden's jeremiad.

"Of course, only a tiny minority agree with bin Laden’s message of violence, but the message is impossible to ignore,” Cordesman said.

By Jeff Stein | March 26, 2010; 12:00 PM ET

gigaom.com: Wikileaks Asks CIA to Stop Spying on It

Wikileaks Asks CIA to Stop Spying on It

http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/wikileaks-asks-cia-to-stop-spying-on-it/

Wikileaks, the crusading non-profit web site that publishes documents companies and governments don’t want released, is alleging that the U.S. State Department and possibly the CIA have been spying on the group and its volunteers, following them on airplanes and even monitoring their production meetings in an Icelandic fish-and-chip restaurant. In a blog post on the Wikileaks site, the group’s co-founder, Julian Assange, asserts that the spying “includes attempted covert following, photographing, filming and the overt detention & questioning of a WikiLeaks’ volunteer in Iceland.”

Wikileaks believes the surveillance campaign is driven in part by the fact that it has obtained “a classified military video showing civilian kills by U.S. pilots” in Afghanistan. The group has said that it plans to release details about the video in a press briefing on April 5. In the blog post, Assange alleges that a Wikileaks volunteer was recently detained by police on a “wholly insignificant matter” and was shown photos of Assange outside the Icelandic Fish & Chips shop in Reykjavik, where a production meeting had been held to review the bombing-run video. Wikileaks later described this incident on its Twitter feed, saying, “We have been shown secret photos of our production meetings and been asked specific questions during detention related to the airstrike.”

In another Twitter message, the group said, “If anything happens to us, you know why: it is our Apr 5 film.” Assange also says in the blog post that after taking a flight from Reykjavik to Copenhagen to speak at an investigative journalism conference, the group got a tip that they were under surveillance and checked the records for the flight (he doesn’t say how this was accomplished) to find “two individuals, recorded as brandishing diplomatic credentials, checked in for my flight…under the name of ‘US State Department.’ The two are not recorded as having any luggage.”

According to the Wikileaks blog post, there are a number of possible reasons for the U.S. government to be spying on the group, including:

  • the classified film “revealing civilian casualties occurring under the command of the U.S. general, David Petraeus.”
  • the release of “a classified 32 page U.S. intelligence report on how to fatally marginalize WikiLeaks”
  • the release of “a classified cable from the U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik reporting on contact between the U.S. and the UK over billions of euros in claimed loan guarantees.”
  • pending releases related to the collapse of the Icelandic banks and Icelandic “oligarchs”

Assange says that Wikileaks has been the subject of a number of suspicious government-related spying attempts, intimidation and harassment over the years, including what he describes as the assassination of two human rights lawyers in Nairobi last March and an “armed attack on my compound there in 2007,” as well as an attack by Chinese computers on Wikileaks servers in Stockholm after the site published photos of murders in Tibet. He also says that a Wikileaks member was “ambushed” in a Luxembourg parking garage by a “James Bond” character.

Wikileaks has recently been raising money to continue its efforts, and has also been working with members of the Icelandic government to try and create an “information haven” in that country.

Friday, March 26, 2010

Foxnews:Chicago Taxi Driver Charged With Attempting to Fund Al Qaeda

Chicago Taxi Driver Charged With Attempting to Fund Al Qaeda

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/03/26/chicago-taxi-driver-charged-attempting-fund-al-qaeda/

CHICAGO -- Federal prosecutors charged a Chicago cab driver on Friday with attempting to provide funds for explosives to Al Qaeda and discussing a possible bomb attack on an unspecified stadium in the United States this summer.

Raja Lahrasib Khan, 56, a naturalized U.S. citizen of Pakistani origin, was charged with attempting to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization.

Khan spoke with another man identified in the complaint only as Individual B on March 11 and appeared to be talking about an attack on an unspecified stadium within the United States, according to the complaint.

Khan allegedly said bags containing remote controlled bombs could be placed within the stadium and then, "boom, boom, boom, boom," prosecutors said.

The balding, bearded Khan, clad in a wrinkled nylon jacket, rumpled pants and sneakers, appeared briefly before U.S. Magistrate Geraldine Soat Brown on Friday afternoon. She ordered him held in the Metropolitan Correctional Center pending a status hearing set for Tuesday.

He was represented at the initial appearance by Daniel P. McLoughlin, a staff attorney with the federal defender program. McLoughlin declined to comment when approached by reporters after the hearing but told Soat Brown that he would probably withdraw from the case and another attorney would be appointed to defend Khan.

U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald said in the statement that there was no imminent danger to the Chicago area but "these charges, once again, affirm that law enforcement must remain constantly vigilant to guard against domestic support of foreign terrorist organizations."

The complaint said that Khan claimed while speaking with an undercover agent to be acquainted with Ilyas Kashmiri, a terrorist leader believed to be based in the tribal areas of western Pakistan who is currently charged in a federal indictment in Chicago with planning a terrorist attack in Denmark.

Prosecutors said the investigation that led to Khan's arrest was unrelated to a separate investigation that produced charges against an American citizen, David Coleman Headley, and a Canadian businessman living in Chicago, Tahawwur Rana, in the November 2008 terrorist attacks that left 166 people dead in the Indian city of Mumbai.

Kashmiri is charged in that indictment along with Headley and Rana in connection with a planned attack on the Danish newspaper that published cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad in 2005 that led to protests in much of the Muslim world.

Headley pleaded guilty last week to the charges. Rana has pleaded not guilty to conspiring to provide material support to terrorists in Denmark and India.

According to the complaint, Khan claimed to have known Kashmiri for 15 years and said he came to believe at some point that Kashmiri was receiving orders from Usama bin Laden. Prosecutors have said that Kashmiri maintains close ties with at least one Al Qaeda leader.

The complaint said that Khan sent $950 from a currency exchange in Chicago to "Lala," a name meaning older brother and which he used in speaking of Kashmiri. It said the money was sent after Kashmiri indicated to Khan that he needed cash to buy explosives.

On March 17, Khan accepted $1,000 from the undercover agent and assured him that the money would be used to purchase weapons and possibly other supplies, the complaint said.

It said that at that time Khan discussed the possibility of sending the money to England with his son. Under the plan, he would meet his son in England, retrieve the money and proceed to Pakistan to deliver it to Kashmiri, they said.

According to the complaint, FBI agents came into contact with Khan's son at O'Hare International Airport on March 23 and that he was traveling to England with some of the money. The son was not charged with any wrongdoing.

ODNI.gov:Press Briefing by Dr. Mathew J. Burrows(chance of another 9/11 "VASTLY DIMINISHED"

http://www.dni.gov/interviews/20100324_interview.pdf

Press Briefing by Dr. Mathew J. Burrows
National Intelligence Council (NIC) Counselor and
Director of the Analysis and Production Staff
Washington Foreign Press Center
Washington, DC
March 24, 2010
MODERATOR:

And second, concerning al-Qaida, Leon Panetta said just a few days ago that – basically that the
al-Qaida leadership is on the run. And what does this mean for al-Qaida’s capability to strike the
U.S.? Are they still capable of an orchestrated attack on the U.S.? Thank you.

DR. BURROWS: Okay, in the latter cases, I was trying to say in the earlier statement, al-
Qaida’s ability to mount what would be, like, a 9/11-style attack we see as vastly diminished. So
I think that would be consistent with what the CIA director was also saying about al-Qaida
Central being on the run. But that doesn’t mean that threat from terrorism isn’t still very high in
our mind.


...And also, I want to ask you, on the peace process – on the Arab-Israeli conflict – we’ve been
hearing a lot from Pentagon officials, from Gen. Petraeus, lately, at the Congress that the
continuing of the conflict does impact U.S. national security. I mean, can you give us, where
does the Palestinian-Israeli conflict stand, vis-à-vis the threats to the U.S.?

DR. BURROWS: Okay, starting with the last – the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – I mean – and
we actually talk about it a little bit in the longer statement – it impacts in several different ways.
First, in terms of instability in the region, I mean, all these forces that we talk about – Hamas,
Hezbollah, others – in a sense, use the Palestinian plight to make their case about the perceived
attack by the West on Islam. And to that extent, we worry about, you know, the fact that they
can use that, and that, that is a mobilizing call for the extremists.

We also – Israel, of course, is an ally. And there is a worry that, without that stability, that it, in
the region, can’t prosper. And I would say that, you know, most of this – the work on this is not
something that we do. I mean, this is done by diplomats, State Department in trying to work this
problem. I mean, what we talk about in our study is a concern of the lack of any peace
settlement, and what that means for the region and how, as I said, that benefits others that we see
are undermining stability in the region.

New York Times: Conflicting Demands Test Netanyahu

“People keep saying that the Israelis, by building these settlements, are creating an impediment to negotiations,” said David J. Rothkopf, a former Clinton administration official who has written about the shaping of American foreign policy. “My reaction is, no they’re not. They’re negotiating. They’re sending a message. And Obama is sending a message right back.”

In Israel, officials said they could not imagine how Mr. Netanyahu could agree to a substantial reduction in building in Jerusalem and still expect to hold on to his office. “The expectation and demand that there be no more construction in Jerusalem is unreasonable,” said Limor Livnat, culture and sports minister and a member of Likud, on Israel Radio. “It is an expectation that the Israeli prime minister cannot accede to.”



Conflicting Demands Test Netanyahu

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/world/middleeast/26mideast.html?ref=world

JERUSALEM — After contentious meetings in the White House, Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, returned home on Thursday with the politically explosive task of responding to an unyielding American demand that he limit Israeli building in East Jerusalem.

The details of the American requests are tightly held. But indirect peace talks with the Palestinians have been in jeopardy since Israel announced 1,600 new housing units in an ultra-Orthodox neighborhood on land wanted by the Palestinians for their future capital, marring a visit here by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. two weeks ago. The goal of the current American effort is to get those talks started.

Mr. Netanyahu’s governing coalition, anchored by his Likud Party, views Jerusalem, west and east, as the undivided, eternal capital of the Jewish people, where it can build where it wants. The Palestinians and their supporters throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds view East Jerusalem as holy and as rightfully under Palestinian sovereignty.

Since the disrupted Biden visit, the Obama administration has been telling Mr. Netanyahu that Israel needs to rein in its Jewish construction in East Jerusalem and offer other signs of good will to the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas.

Mr. Netanyahu has brought up several possible gestures, including restrictions on Israeli troop activities in the West Bank, the freeing of Palestinian prisoners, some latitude for reconstruction in Gaza and further efforts to bolster the Palestinian economy.

The Americans have welcomed those gestures. The White House press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said Thursday, “We’re making progress on important issues.”

But building in Jerusalem remains the sticking point. Mr. Netanyahu is expected to meet on Friday with his top seven cabinet ministers to begin to form his response. It may be some days or longer before it is complete.

The Arab League is scheduled to meet this weekend in Libya and is likely to repeat demands for a freeze on Israeli building in occupied areas before giving a final endorsement to the return of the Palestinian Authority to peace talks with Israel. Mr. Abbas, the Palestinian president, has sought pan-Arab cover for his decision to return to the talks.

Mr. Netanyahu returned to an overheated political atmosphere fed in part by news coverage of his Washington trip, describing his treatment at the White House as deeply humiliating because neither photographs or ceremony marked his visit.

There is little doubt that Obama administration officials thought it was appropriate to reciprocate the embarrassment felt by Mr. Biden here and to send a tough message about the need for commitment regarding Jerusalem, American officials said.

“People keep saying that the Israelis, by building these settlements, are creating an impediment to negotiations,” said David J. Rothkopf, a former Clinton administration official who has written about the shaping of American foreign policy. “My reaction is, no they’re not. They’re negotiating. They’re sending a message. And Obama is sending a message right back.”

In Israel, officials said they could not imagine how Mr. Netanyahu could agree to a substantial reduction in building in Jerusalem and still expect to hold on to his office. “The expectation and demand that there be no more construction in Jerusalem is unreasonable,” said Limor Livnat, culture and sports minister and a member of Likud, on Israel Radio. “It is an expectation that the Israeli prime minister cannot accede to.”

In an interview with Yom Yom, an ultra-Orthodox newspaper, Eli Yishai, who leads the Interior Ministry, which pushed forward the 1,600 units during Mr. Biden’s visit, said, “I thank God I have been given the opportunity to be the minister who approves the construction of thousands of housing units in Jerusalem.”

American officials said that their goal was not to make the government collapse, but that without a real reduction in Jewish building in East Jerusalem, peace talks with the Palestinians would be imperiled.

New York Times:U.S. and Pakistan Agree to Reinforce Strategic Ties

U.S. and Pakistan Agree to Reinforce Strategic Ties

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/world/asia/26policy.html?ref=world

WASHINGTON — Pakistan and the United States wrapped up two days of high-level talks on Thursday, with a raft of economic development initiatives, an agreement to hasten deliveries of military hardware and a promise to put their often mistrustful relationship on a new footing.

In a communiqué issued after the talks, the countries said they would “redouble their efforts to deal effectively with terrorism” and would work together for “peace and stability in Afghanistan.”

Administration officials said Pakistan was likely to get swifter delivery of F-16 fighter jets, naval frigates and helicopter gunships, as well as new remotely piloted aircraft for surveillance missions. But the United States was silent about Pakistan’s most heavily advertised proposal: a civil nuclear agreement similar to the one the Bush administration signed with Pakistan’s archrival, India.

Given Pakistan’s history of selling nuclear technology to Iran, Libya and North Korea, such an agreement would realistically be 10 or 15 years away, a senior administration official said Thursday. Still, the administration was careful not to dismiss the idea out of hand.

“This is a new day,” Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said in greeting Pakistan’s foreign minister, Shah Mahmood Qureshi. “For the past year, the Obama administration has shown in our words and our deeds a different approach and a different attitude toward Pakistan.”

The “strategic dialogue” was by itself meant to send a message: The administration used the term reserved for the substantive, wide-ranging exchanges it carries on with important countries like China and India. Pakistan and the United States held three such dialogues during the Bush administration.

But last year, Mr. Qureshi asked Mrs. Clinton to upgrade the exchange to the level of foreign minister. On Wednesday, he said he hoped the two days of higher-level talks would help Pakistan and the United States overcome a history that “did not always enjoy a sunny side.”

Mr. Qureshi said the United States had agreed to put on a fast track some longstanding Pakistani requests for military hardware.

Although Mrs. Clinton deflected a question about civil nuclear cooperation, she said, “We’re committed to helping Pakistan meet its real energy needs.”

Among specific announcements was an agreement for the United States Agency for International Development to help Pakistan upgrade three thermal power plants. The administration said it would try to push through legislation creating so-called reconstruction opportunity zones in Pakistan. And it hopes to set up a fund to stimulate direct foreign investment.

Pakistan’s military campaign against Taliban insurgents in the Swat Valley and South Waziristan has improved the tenor of its relationship with Washington. But success on the battlefield cuts both ways for Pakistan, analysts said. It gives the country’s government in Islamabad a more credible argument for increased military aid. But it also imposes greater expectations from the United States about Pakistan’s counterinsurgency efforts and military cooperation.

“Yes, you get a pat on the back,” said Bruce O. Riedel, an expert on Pakistan at the Brookings Institution. “But now that you’ve shown you can do something, you’ve got to do more.”

Pakistan’s role in Afghanistan also remains a subject of intense scrutiny in the United States. The Pakistani authorities cooperated with the Central Intelligence Agency to capture the Taliban’s military chief, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar. But some analysts question whether the Pakistanis are rounding up other Taliban leaders, including shadow Afghan governors, simply to make sure that Pakistan has leverage in any future political bargaining in Kabul.

Mr. Qureshi insisted that Pakistan wanted Afghanistan to lead this process. “If they feel we can contribute, if we can help, we’ll be more than willing to help,” he said. “But we leave it to them.”

On this subject, however, administration officials are more interested in hearing from Pakistan’s chief of army staff, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, who was part of the delegation. General Kayani recently held talks in Islamabad with Afghanistan’s president, Hamid Karzai, and the general is viewed as critical to determining the role Pakistan will play.

Of all the raw nerves in the relationship, Pakistan’s nuclear ambitions may be the most sensitive. Islamabad yearns for an agreement with the United States because it would confer legitimacy on Pakistan’s existing program.

But Washington does not formally recognize Pakistan as a nuclear power. The selling of nuclear secrets by the father of its nuclear program, Abdul Qadeer Khan, and the country’s refusal to allow American investigators to have access to him ensures that this recognition may be a long way off.

“The question is, can you move somewhere toward giving legitimacy to a Pakistani nuclear program?” said Daniel S. Markey, senior fellow for India, Pakistan and South Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations. “Is there space between a civil nuclear deal and just saying ‘no’?”

New York Times: American Terror Suspect Traveled Unimpeded (Headley)

American Terror Suspect Traveled Unimpeded

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/world/asia/26pstan.html?hp

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — An American charged with helping plan the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India, moved effortlessly between the United States, Pakistan and India for nearly seven years, training at a militant camp in Pakistan on five occasions, according to a plea agreement released by the Justice Department last week.

The odyssey of David C. Headley, 49, included scouting targets in several cities in India and meeting with a senior operative of Al Qaeda in Pakistan’s tribal areas. These and other new details of Mr. Headley’s activities, contained in the plea agreement, raise troubling questions about how an American citizen could travel for so long undetected from his home base in Chicago to well-established terrorist training camps in Pakistan.

The document shows that Mr. Headley made two trips to North Waziristan, the heart of Qaeda operations in the tribal area where the United States is still pushing Pakistan for a military offensive to clear out militants. His handlers, the document reveals, included a former Pakistani military commander with ties to a Pakistani extremist group and even Al Qaeda.

From there, Mr. Headley not only helped plan the Mumbai attack, it says, but he was put in contact with a Qaeda cell in Europe that may still be operative. The document shows the cell was well supplied with weapons and money and primed for an attack until the moment Mr. Headley was arrested by the F.B.I. at O’Hare airport last October.

Mr. Headley divulged details of his life as a spy and militant as part of a plea agreement that will spare him the death penalty, his lawyer, John T. Theis, said this week. Mr. Headley’s maximum sentence would be life imprisonment, he said. As part of his plea, Mr. Headley has volunteered to talk to the authorities in India, Pakistan and Denmark, where he was plotting with a Qaeda cell to attack the Copenhagen offices of the newspaper that had printed derisive cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, the agreement says.

The revelations around the European cell were particularly disturbing, said Bruce Riedel, who was a member of the National Security Council in the Clinton administration and is now at the Brookings Institution. They showed that “Al Qaeda still has a significant operational infrastructure somewhere in Europe,” he said. Mr. Headley’s story also showed in clear contours the close relationship between Al Qaeda and the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, he said.

Mr. Headley was able to use his Pakistani and American heritage to great advantage, playing up his American descent on his mother’s side in India, and then behaving as a Pakistani in Pakistan, where his father was born.

As he became more intensely involved in the web of militant activities in Pakistan — sometimes training for months at a time — and then making five trips to Mumbai from 2006 to 2008 to scout locations, Mr. Headley kept his base in Chicago, the document says.

Mr. Headley started his career as a militant scout with Lashkar-e-Taiba, a terrorist group established decades ago with the help of the Pakistani military and intelligence agencies to fight against India’s control of disputed territory in Kashmir.

Lashkar was supposed to have been outlawed in Pakistan in 2002, but it remains active behind the veil of a public charity in Pakistan and, according to Mr. Headley’s plea, continued to be assisted by former Pakistani military officials in recent years.

From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Headley trained at Lashkar camps on five occasions, learning about explosives, small arms and countersurveillance techniques.

The plea names a retired Pakistani military officer, Col. Abdur Rehman Hashim Syed, known as Pasha, as Mr. Headley’s main contact with Lashkar. Earlier prosecution documents said that Colonel Syed was arrested last year in Pakistan on unspecified charges, but then released. In early 2009 Colonel Syed introduced Mr. Headley to Muhammad Ilyas Kashmiri, a Qaeda operative in North Waziristan, according to the document.

Colonel Syed then served as the go-between for the men, who all met together in North Waziristan, according to the document.

The visit in February 2009 may finally have put Mr. Headley on the radar of the American authorities, who started tracking him in the late spring of last year, Mr. Riedel said. Mr. Kashmiri is considered to be one of Al Qaeda’s most dangerous commanders. The Long War Journal, a Web site that specializes in reports on militancy, says he is a former member of Pakistan’s elite commando Special Services Group, though Pakistani intelligence officials deny that. He was the target of a drone attack last September. After initial reports that he was killed, it appears that he survived, according to Pakistani officials and militants.

It was Mr. Kashmiri who asked Mr. Headley to help plan the attack against the Danish newspaper, the plea document says.

After Mr. Headley’s second trip to North Waziristan in May of last year, he was told by Mr. Kashmiri that the “elders” had approved the attack in Denmark, a remark that Mr. Headley understood to mean the Qaeda leadership, the agreement says.

The attack against the newspaper, which involved a Qaeda cell already in place in Europe, was planned to be particularly gruesome, with suicide attackers trying to kill everyone in the building, the plea says.

As the planning for the Copenhagen attack unfolded, Mr. Headley returned to Denmark for a final scouting mission last August.

He then met with the Qaeda team in Europe, according to the agreement. The precise location of that meeting with Qaeda operatives is not specified in the document, apparently in deference to investigations by Western intelligence agencies. When Mr. Headley was arrested on Oct. 3, 2009, he was headed to Pakistan once again to meet Mr. Kashmiri in North Waziristan to hand over 13 surveillance videos he had taken in Copenhagen.

Mr. Headley’s plea agreement with the government was not his first. After being sentenced for drug trafficking in the 1990s, he served as an informant in Pakistan for the Drug Enforcement Agency as part of a deal for a lighter sentence. He was in Pakistan for the drug agency from the late 1990s until at least 2001. By 2002, he was training with Lashkar, raising the possibility that he had made contact with the militants while still working for the drug agency.

In addition to sites in Mumbai, Mr. Headley scouted targets in Pune and Goa, the document says. He was sent to Mumbai several times, it says. There, he made videos of the targets, including the Taj Mahal Hotel, took coordinates with a GPS unit, and scouted sites in the harbor where 10 Lashkar militants landed Nov. 26, 2008, in inflatable boats. They killed 163 people.